RESEARCH LIBRARY

Read the research.
Not just the claims.

Explore the scientific literature behind Urolithin A, the complementary actives used in Rolithin formulas, and the formulation concepts discussed throughout our site.

01

Published
literature

02

Ingredient-level
references

03

Evidence context
made visible

EVIDENCE LIBRARY

Follow the evidence
ingredient by ingredient.

Human studies are prioritized where available. Each reference below links directly to its PubMed record.

Research shown here concerns the individual ingredient or formulation concept. Unless explicitly stated, studies were not performed on Rolithin products.
01
CORE MOLECULE

Urolithin A

HUMAN CLINICAL EVIDENCE
HUMAN RANDOMIZED PLACEBO-CONTROLLED

Older adults · 1,000 mg/day · 4 months

In 66 older adults, Urolithin A was compared with placebo. Muscle endurance measures improved, while the primary measures of six-minute walking distance and maximal muscle ATP production were not significantly different from placebo.

JAMA Network Open · 2022 VIEW PUBMED ↗
HUMAN DOUBLE-BLIND 4 MONTHS

Middle-aged adults · 500–1,000 mg/day

A randomized trial in 88 untrained, overweight, middle-aged adults evaluated placebo, 500 mg and 1,000 mg daily and reported changes in muscle-performance measures and biomarkers related to mitochondrial health.

Cell Reports Medicine · 2022 VIEW PUBMED ↗
Evidence context

The human trials listed above studied doses up to 1,000 mg/day. They should not be interpreted as evidence that a higher amount necessarily produces a greater effect.

02
STACK ACTIVE

NMN

NAD+ PRECURSOR RESEARCH
HUMAN RANDOMIZED 12 WEEKS

Healthy adults · 250 mg/day

Thirty healthy participants received NMN or placebo. Whole-blood NAD+ increased significantly in the NMN group, with no obvious treatment-related abnormalities reported during the study period.

Frontiers in Nutrition · 2022 VIEW PUBMED ↗
HUMAN SAFETY DOUBLE-BLIND

Healthy adults · 1,250 mg/day · 4 weeks

A randomized study in 31 healthy men and women evaluated repeated oral administration of 1,250 mg NMN daily. Clinical measurements remained within physiological variation during the four-week study.

Scientific Reports · 2022 VIEW PUBMED ↗
Evidence context

Increasing blood NAD+ is a measurable biochemical outcome. It is not, by itself, proof of a specific anti-aging or clinical benefit.

03
STACK ACTIVE

Trans-Resveratrol

HUMAN DATA · MIXED OUTCOMES
HUMAN RANDOMIZED 90 DAYS

Older adults · 300 or 1,000 mg/day

A placebo-controlled pilot study in 32 overweight older adults evaluated two resveratrol doses. Safety measures remained within normal ranges, while metabolic outcomes were mixed.

Experimental Gerontology · 2014 VIEW PUBMED ↗
HUMAN CROSSOVER 6 WEEKS

Older adults · high-dose resveratrol

In 30 older glucose-intolerant adults, resveratrol did not significantly change glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, weight, blood pressure or lipid profile, although vascular and mitochondrial-related measures showed changes.

The Journals of Gerontology · 2017 VIEW PUBMED ↗
Evidence context

Human resveratrol research is heterogeneous. Outcomes vary by dose, population, duration and endpoint, so individual studies should not be generalized into a universal benefit.

04
STACK COMPONENT

Piperine / BioPerine®

CO-ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH
HUMAN DOUBLE-BLIND PHARMACOKINETICS

Resveratrol + 5 or 25 mg piperine

A 24-participant pilot study tested resveratrol with different piperine doses. Overall pharmacokinetic results did not demonstrate the large resveratrol bioavailability enhancement previously observed in animal research.

European Journal of Cancer Prevention · 2021 VIEW PUBMED ↗
HUMAN CROSSOVER 20 MG PIPERINE

Resveratrol + piperine in healthy adults

A crossover study reported differences in cerebral blood-flow response with the combination, but no improvement in cognitive performance and no significant difference in measured resveratrol plasma concentrations.

British Journal of Nutrition · 2014 VIEW PUBMED ↗
Evidence context

These studies evaluated piperine in combination with resveratrol. They do not establish a universal absorption multiplier for every ingredient, nor were they studies of the Rolithin Stack.

05
FORMULATION CONCEPT

Liposomal Delivery

COMPOUND-SPECIFIC RESEARCH
HUMAN RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER

Liposomal vs standard vitamin C

In a 27-participant crossover trial, a specific liposomal vitamin C formulation produced higher plasma and leukocyte exposure than the non-liposomal vitamin C comparator.

European Journal of Nutrition · 2024 VIEW PUBMED ↗
HUMAN PHARMACOKINETICS VITAMIN C

Oral liposomal encapsulation study

An earlier human study also found higher circulating vitamin C concentrations after oral liposomal delivery than after standard oral vitamin C, while intravenous delivery produced higher concentrations than either.

Nutrition and Metabolic Insights · 2016 VIEW PUBMED ↗
Important distinction

These studies concern specific liposomal vitamin C formulations. They demonstrate that delivery technology can influence pharmacokinetics in some formulations, but they do not establish a specific absorption percentage for Urolithin A or for Rolithin products.

RESEARCH NOTE

Scientific evidence evolves. Study results depend on the population, formulation, dose, duration and measured outcome. References are provided for educational transparency and should not be interpreted as medical advice or as proof that a Rolithin product will reproduce the outcome of an individual study.

KEEP EXPLORING

Research is only useful
when you can trace it.

Continue with our Science overview, or request the available documentation associated with your product.